On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Bálint Réczey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, last time I brought this up the project decision was to allow > minor improvements, too: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.devel/15323 > > The best solution for me as a maintainer at Debian would be limiting > the changes to security fixes conforming to the policy: > https://www.debian.org/security/faq#policy , but as a second-best > option I could live with the special LTS branches. The best solution for many end-users would probably be *not* to limit the changes to security fixes - if we have a fix for a mis-dissection, they'd probably want that, for example. Given that, having separate "security fixes only" branches, for packagers and users who *only* want security fixes, and support branches, for packagers and users who also want those bug fixes that we deem "appropriate" for the support branches, is probably the right answer. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
