Hi, On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:19:51PM -0400, Kevin Cox wrote: > I was attempting to dissect a 64 bit bitfield and was wondering what the > best/preferred method was. I saw a question on ask.wireshark.org[0] > which had a single answer the said to use a text field. > > [0] > http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/20599/dissecting-bitfields-larger-than-32-bits > > I was wondering if there is a better way to do this.
Could you check proto_tree_add_split_bits_item_ret_val()? It looks someone had already this problem. Cheers, Jakub. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
