On May 28, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > Joerg, do you have any of the captures where wlan_datapad was necessary, so > we can try to figure out if there's any obvious indication as to whether the > padding is present (e.g., one of the bits in the flags or status fields)?
The documentation I've seen for OmniPeek shows it supporting both "Aruba Remote Adapter" and "Cisco Remote Adapter"; if they use the same protocol, perhaps, for example, the Aruba devices add the padding and the Cisco devices (presumably) don't. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
