On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:58:51AM -0400, Bill Meier wrote: > While reviewing the new ceph dissector [1], two issues cropped up > where my build on Linux (using Autofoo) apparently gave different > results then a build by Kevin Cox (the submitter of the new > dissector) using CMake on Linux. > > He used GCC 4.9.1 and CMake while I used GCC 4.9.0 and Autofoo. > > 1. The Autofoo compile indicated an > "unused but set" variable > The CMake apparently did not.
Should not be: I do (or at least did) get these messages regularly with CMake. > Different CFlags ? As the order of flags in both files is rather random I did a bit of grepping, sorting and some manual editing. It looks like the flags should be the same. > 2. The ceph dissector had several value_string_ext structs > defined as 'static const ...'. > > The Wireshark built with CMake worked AOK when > the ceph dissector used the extended value > strings for the first time (i.e., no exceptions). > > The Wireshark built with Autofoo trapped > when the extended value string structs were used > for the first time (when there was an attempt to > write to the struct). > > IOW: In one case, the structs were apparently not in a r/o section > while in the other they apparently were. > > I've no idea if this difference has anything to > do with CMake vs Autofoo. > > > Thoughts ? Not on first sight. Maybe you can do a comparison on your system where all the other tools are identical? Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
