On 07/30/14 01:30, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:47:53PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
However, I don't quite understand why for tree!=NULL but not visible,
proto_tree_add_text() returns tree. I can see this in the code, we call
TRY_TO_FAKE_THIS_ITEM(), which returns the tree itself when it's not
visible. But what sense does this make for the caller?
I think it's because while proto_trees are allowed to be NULL, we
don't want (or the API is not ready for) proto_items to be NULL.
(IOW that "return tree" quoted above is (ab)using the fact that a
proto_item is a proto_tree.)
Does this mean that this code in add_subtree_format() should be
setting *tree_item to 'tree' (instead of NULL) here:
/* Make sure pi is initialized in case TRY_TO_FAKE_THIS_ITEM bails */
if (tree_item != NULL)
*tree_item = NULL;
Wouldn't be it simpler if we just remove 'tree_item' argument?
Cause I understand that after change *tree_item is always the same as return
value?
Well, no, they'll only return the same thing if TRY_TO_FAKE_THIS_ITEM
short-cuts us out, right?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
