On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Graham Bloice <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4 August 2014 07:34, Alexis La Goutte <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Evan, >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Gerrit currently displays the status of the Petri-Dish flag in the >> > change-summary list as a "PD" column. I don't think it's particularly >> > useful, and it makes it harder to tell at a glance whether a change has >> been >> > verified or not (since the two columns are right next to each other so >> you >> > can't as easily scan for the green checkmark). >> > >> > Does anybody else prefer to keep it shown? Is there even a way to >> remove it >> > (I looked in preferences but didn't see anything). >> > >> > Thoughts? >> +1 but i not sure if it is possible... >> >> >> > I find it useful, although when I find a self+2 commit that breaks the > build without the PD flag it makes me want to rant. > On that topic, Alexis (and/or Gerald) the petri-dish seems to be working pretty well; what else is needed to make it "done" and when should we require a Verified+1 to merge again? Is there a way to require a +1 from the petri-dish specifically? Thanks, Evan
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
