On Aug 18, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guy, how are you finding these last four or five API abuses? Do you > have some sort of super-checkAPIs or are you just doing a lot of > manual code review?
No, and not exactly. I have my regression script, which I was using to check whether I'd broken anything with the X11 changes; it runs two versions of tshark against a file, and compares the results. It runs against a big collection of captures, including the menagerie used for fuzz testing. It *also* captures the standard error of tshark in both cases, and reports it regardless of whether it's different or not, so it catches dissector bug messages. I then do the code review on the dissectors that are issuing bug messages. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
