> Frankly, conversation structures shouldn't have per-packet data in > them at all; this was probably the easiest way to fix the fuzz > failure, but it really seems odd to me that it even needs to be done.
> Thoughts? True. Per-packet data shouldn't be part of the conversation struct. I'm working step by step to refactor the USB dissectors, this will be addressed at some point (as time permits). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
