Hi Sean, Thus wrote Stalley, Sean ([email protected]):
> I think we should discuss how to clean up the usb dissector. It seems > like we are running into the "too many cooks in the kitchen" scenario. So far, our changes co-existed nicely. Now's the first time they were in conflict ;-) > My primary goal has been to reuse as much of the USB dissector as > possible for the MA USB dissector. > I've been trying to simplify/modularize dissect_usb_common() along the > way, but if I'm just getting in the way let me know. I appreciate your work, the USB dissector definitely needs more cleanup. As I said in the previous mail, I'd like to reduce the number of state variables and simplify the execution flow (there's too many conditions and branches). I'll upload some more changes tomorrow. Best regards, Martin ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
