On 8/28/14 12:04 AM, Anders Broman wrote: > > Den 28 aug 2014 08:56 skrev "Guy Harris" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> >> On Aug 27, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Gerald Combs <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> > On 8/27/14 2:28 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: >> >> On 08/27/14 16:57, Evan Huus wrote: >> >>> On master, cmake seems to still be building "wireshark" for gtk and >> >>> "qtshark" for qt. Should that be "wireshark" for qt and >> >>> "wireshark-gtk" or "wireshark-legacy" for gtk? >> > >> > +1. Unfortunately each time I make a change in that direction it seems >> > like someone complains. :) >> >> For Wireshark 2 (or whatever the next release is called), I'd strongly > vote for calling the regular version - i.e., the Qt version - just > "wireshark", calling the GTK+ version "wireshark-gtk", and letting the > complainers rename the binary themselves if they don't like the name. >> > +1
In progress at https://code.wireshark.org/review/3919 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
