On Oct 25, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote: > https://code.wireshark.org/review/527 has been bouncing around since > March; I think the current version is ready to go (and it's only a > handful of lines changed) but I'd appreciate if somebody else could > take a look before it falls off the edge of the map for 4th time.
I think the current version is ready to go into the bit bucket, as it appears not to be necessary; TShark, as built from the top of the trunk as of now, *without* those changes, was quite capable of reading, from an xzcat pipe, a huge pcap-ng file, and my analysis of the code (see the comments on the review and in bug 9710, and the comments I've added to the file_wrappers.c code) indicates that those changes shouldn't make any difference. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
