On 20 November 2014 10:51, Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Graham Bloice > <graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote: > > On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer <maarten.beze...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote: > >> > On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote: > >> > > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has > >> > > identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it worthwhile, then we > >> > > will > >> > > end up with stuff not generally used in the repo and then who will > be > >> > > maintaining these bits of CMake? > >> > > >> > [1] is an attempt I found to have out of source builds. But it never > got > >> > fed > >> > back to Wireshark and consists (eventually) outdated scripts. By > >> > integrating such functionality, keeps the development scripts > >> > up-to-date. > >> > > >> > I am also willing to write a (wiki) document explaining the out of > >> > source > >> > builds (when my patches get accepted) to help out others as well. As > the > >> > current information about this subject on the Internet is very > minimal. > >> > > >> > The maintenance of my patches is not too hard I think. I mainly use > >> > (cmake) > >> > scripts that are already available. The changes I made are to make > them > >> > more > >> > generic, e.g. by getting rid of hard-coded paths. All scripts are > >> > also/already used when Wireshark itself gets build. > >> > >> Is there anything left for me to do or to explain? > >> I would like gain some momentum either direction (approved or > abandoned), > >> so I > >> know whether my current (out of source) plug-in implementation can be > used > >> at > >> work or not. > >> > > > > I was hoping to get a comment from Joerg Mayer (our resident CMake dev) > but > > he's been a bit quiet lately. > May be also with Balint, Debian Package use cmake for build... > > > > I'm really struggling for time at the moment to test and comment on it > > myself. > And now Petri Dish can build on Windows with cmake for see if there is > some regression ;-) > Does the Ubuntu Petri-dish have a cmake build step? -- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
