On Nov 28, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Stephen Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now that we've gone ahead and allowed C++ code into Wireshark after
> years of resistance:), will we always require the user to have a C++
> compiler available? That would simplify refactoring the code to call
> GTK vs. Qt vs. any other UI-toolkit code. We could have a single
> main.cpp that displays common things like -h usage and -v version
> information and then call the UI-toolkit specific code as necessary.
I'd call it wireshark.cpp, but, other than that:
1) that eliminates the greasy hack we're doing with autotools to force
the Qt Wireshark to be linked with the C++ library
and
2) should let us (modulo toolkit-specific argv parsing) have more
common code between Wireshark with different UI toolkits
so, if we're willing to have Wireshark always be a C++ program (even if it has
a lot of C code in it), that sounds good to me.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
