Hi Jeff, 2014-11-26 19:26 GMT+01:00 Jeff Morriss <[email protected]>: > On 11/26/14 13:01, Stephen Fisher wrote: >> >> Is there any reason a user would have both GTK3 and GTK2 installed and >> not want to use GTK3 for wireshark-gtk builds? We could simplify it to >> be --with-gtk/--without-gtk and --with-qt/--without-qt and just use the >> latest version of GTK on the system (3.x, if available, otherwise 2.x) >> when requested. The default could remain to make a Qt and GTK build and >> if the user didn't want GTK anymore, just pass --without-gtk to the >> configure script. > > > I have both Gtk3 and Gtk2 installed but build with Gtk2. The Gtk3 UI just > looks horrible to me (and, no, I'm not one who really cares about how things > look but, well, I have a choice). Could you please share a screenshot about what you find horrible in GTK3? I'm using the Debian package which looks quite good to me and I managed to get the OS X version to be nice as well: http://balintreczey.hu/blog/beautiful-wireshark-on-os-x-using-homebrew-and-gtk3quartz/
The only platform to receive a facelift left is Win32/Win64 which Pascal had success with: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201410/msg00033.html When I get my hands on a Windows build system I will give GTK+ 3.14 a try, but since this most probably won't happen this year I would be happy is someone working on Windows could fix the build. I actually think the problems Pascal mentioned are not bugs in Wireshark but in the Win32/64 GTK+ bundle and should be reported to the creator of the bundle. Cheers, Balint > > (I do intentionally keep the Gtk3 libraries around, though, for those rare > occasions when I might want/need to build it.) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
