On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:06PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: | | On Jan 3, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Luke Mewburn <[email protected]> wrote: | | > I suspect we need special-case handling in find_conversation() (etc) | > for PT_TCAP, including possibly a separate hashtable or keeping | > the TCAP BEGIN in the conversation_hashtable_no_addr2_or_port2 in | > parallel to the entry in conversation_hashtable_exact. | | I suspect what we need is to separate the general concept of | conversations from the details of particular protocols, so that each | type of conversation would supply its own matching code.
That sounds better. That could replace the existing special cases for PT_UDP and AT_FC too.
pgpbPVMMsJqII.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
