On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2015-01-08 11:38 GMT+01:00 Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi list
>> I pushed a patch a couple of days ago
>>
>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/6350/
>>
>> I think it's getting stuck for some reason (not even the petri dish
>> buildbot has processed it).
>>
>> Other patches submitted later (eg. https://code.wireshark.org/review/6394
>>  or https://code.wireshark.org/review/6367) have been or are being
>> processed.
>> Is there any reason for that? I'm not pushing anyone... just wondering if
>> for some reason it is blocked.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dario.
>>
>>
> Hi Dario,
>
> it simply means that no one had the time to review it yet. The first
> comment I can say (iwthotu goint too much into details) is that in my
> opinion jsmn.* files should not go in dissectors folder (where we have real
> dissectors and not utility functions). So it should go somehwere else, but
> I'm not sure about the location (maybe in epan folder).
>
+1
Like in epan/jsmn (like for nghttp2)

>
> Regards,
> Pascal.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to