It wasn't an extremely interesting page (IMO)... It mostly described
the idea behind the project and its (undoubtedly waaay out of date) status.
On 02/04/15 10:49, Maynard, Chris wrote:
Might that be a little hasty to remove the EMEM page so soon? I'm sure there
are developers still working with older releases that are using emem. I don't
know what information was there or how useful it was compared to the various
README's, but presumably it provided additional information beyond what was
available anywhere else.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:45 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 7ced085: emem is dead!
Long live wmem!
So I deleted the EMEMification page from the wiki but I'm not sure what to do
with the Canary page:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Canary
It looks like wmem does use canaries (under some circumstances?) so maybe it
shouldn't be deleted. But I'm not familiar enough with what wmem is doing to
rewrite it either...
On 02/04/15 10:04, Evan Huus wrote:
Woohoo!
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Wireshark code review
<[email protected]> wrote:
URL:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=7
ced085550d030ea10525d650c8d5d8dc7c99684
Submitter: Anders Broman ([email protected])
Changed: branch: master
Repository: wireshark
Commits:
7ced085 by Michael Mann ([email protected]):
emem is dead! Long live wmem!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
