Pascal --

Thanks for the response. I tired various things.
1) did a clean build
2) deleted the build folder (the one described in README.CMAKE)
3) downloaded the latest tarball of source and compiled in a different
folder.

But all of them yield the same result. I have not tried building on a
different machine. I'll do it now.

-- Anil

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 2015-03-15 14:16 GMT+01:00 Anil <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> Hi --
>>
>> I have been seeing this problem with the wireshark since 12 Mar 2015.
>>
>> I get the below error
>>
>> anil@anilpc:~/ws_srcpkg/build$ ./run/wireshark-gtk
>> 18:26:50          Err  Field 'Src Vm Name' (nstrace.src_vm) is an
>> integral value (FT_INT64) but is being displayed as BASE_NONE
>>
>> Trace/breakpoint trap
>>
>>
>> I can see that enum (enum ftenum) values are different in different files
>> (frames) as seen from GDB.
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x00007ffff6593c13 in g_logv () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
>> #1  0x00007ffff6593d72 in g_log () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
>> #2  0x00007ffff306df34 in tmp_fld_check_assert (hfinfo=0x7fffe4867698
>> <hf+88>, hfinfo@entry=0x22e3b)
>>     at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5751
>> #3  proto_register_field_init (hfinfo=hfinfo@entry=0x7fffe4867698
>> <hf+88>, parent=parent@entry=142907)
>>     at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5924
>> #4  0x00007ffff306e1c9 in proto_register_field_common 
>> (proto=proto@entry=0x8694a0,
>> hfi=hfi@entry=0x7fffe4867698 <hf+88>,
>>     parent=parent@entry=142907) at
>> /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5402
>> #5  0x00007ffff30751e1 in proto_register_field_array (parent=142907,
>> hf=hf@entry=0x7fffe4867640 <hf>,
>>     num_records=num_records@entry=28) at
>> /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5431
>> #6  0x00007fffe4666447 in proto_register_ns () at packet-nstrace.c:496
>> #7  0x00007ffff65a96b8 in g_slist_foreach () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
>> #8  0x00007ffff30750d2 in proto_init (
>>     register_all_protocols_func=register_all_protocols_func@entry=0x422910
>> <register_all_protocols@plt>,
>>     register_all_handoffs_func=register_all_handoffs_func@entry=0x41f910
>> <register_all_protocol_handoffs@plt>,
>>     cb=cb@entry=0x4b3290 <splash_update>, client_data=client_data@entry
>> =0x9ce360)
>>     at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:497
>> #9  0x00007ffff30550bb in epan_init (register_all_protocols_func=0x422910
>> <register_all_protocols@plt>,
>>     register_all_handoffs_func=0x41f910
>> <register_all_protocol_handoffs@plt>, cb=0x4b3290 <splash_update>,
>>     client_data=client_data@entry=0x9ce360) at
>> /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/epan.c:116
>> #10 0x0000000000423726 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdf58) at
>> /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/ui/gtk/main.c:2511
>>
>>
>> (gdb) p (int) FT_STRINGZ
>> *$1 = 24*
>>
>> (gdb) frame 6
>> #6  0x00007fffe4666447 in proto_register_ns () at packet-nstrace.c:496
>> 496    packet-nstrace.c: No such file or directory.
>>
>> (gdb) p (int) FT_STRINGZ
>> *$2 = 18*
>>
>
> Hi Anil,
>
> it's probably time for you to clean and rebuild as you have some objects
> that use an old ftenum (the dependency check probably get confused at some
> point and did not recompile all the files adter the ftypes.h update for
> FT_(U)INT_(40|48|56) addition).
>
> Pascal.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to