Hi Anders,

Thanks for the prompt reply. I will give it a try.

Thanks again,
Juanjo

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Anders Broman <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juan Jose Martin
> Carrascosa
> *Sent:* den 19 mars 2015 16:05
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* [Wireshark-dev] Issue with dissector on top of TCP
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am writing a dissector on top of TCP (let's call it Wrapper). For a
> given TCP segment, I see that the payload length is 1460 bytes. Within
> those bytes, I have messages of my Wrapper protocol.  The message length of
> my protocol for those messages is 72 bytes.
>
>
>
> This is, 20 x messages = 1440. The remainder is 20 bytes. And those 20
> bytes are not being dissected nor used at all. (I have verified all this
> information). Those 20 messages are the beginning of a new Wrapper message,
> but the message is not completed in that segment.
>
>
>
> The issue is that the next TCP segment starts 20 bytes later, and thus, it
> results in dissection errors since that packet, making Malformed Packets or
> not dissected packets almost everything.
>
>
>
> I would need to know which is the proper way to let TCP know that those 20
> bytes have to be used for the next segment.
>
>
>
> Do I have to do anything with the tvb? or on the other hand I have to play
> with the return value?
>
>
>
> I have spent already a lot of hours on this and can't figure it out. I
> hope anyone has any advice for this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Juanjo
>
>
>
> See doc/README.dissector
>
>
>
> 2.7 Reassembly/desegmentation for protocols running atop TCP.
>
>
>
> Section 2.7.1 Using tcp_dissect_pdus(). Should probably work for you.
> Grep for tcp_dissect_pdus in the sources to find multiple examples on how
> to use it…
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Anders
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to