2015-06-13 14:51 GMT+02:00 Francesco Fondelli <[email protected]> :
> I think we should revert to the original behavior as suggested in the > bug report. WS being able to automatically dissect the majority of > MPLS encapsulated traffic with the first nibble set to 0 is a feature > we should preserve. > Hi Francesco, Jasper suggested a simple heuristic. I added you as a reviewer of https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/8912/ Pascal. > thank you > ciao > fra > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Jasper Bongertz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just added a bug report, as agreed with Alexis, regarding the > > dissection failure in 1.99 when a frame contains MPLS shims. This is > > the bug report URL: > > > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 > > > > and I also attached a screen shot comparing 1.12.5 and 1.99 to this > > email (I hope it doesn't get stripped off by the list) > > > > Cheers, > > Jasper > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
