Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:

> On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:09 AM, Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@...> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for all your responses - much clearer now. I have used what I
think is right for what I am doing and all
> seems OK. On a quick review of all the code, all I would say is that some
of the uses are probably inconsistent
> with what has been said.
> 
> Yes, we know there are some places where
tvb_length()/tvb_captured_length() is being used when it
> shouldn't be.

Robert, if you've identified instances where they are used improperly,
please feel free to report them by opening a bug report at
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/, and if you're able, you can even
provide a patch correcting the misuse yourself.  These pages should help
with patch submissions: 

https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSrcContribute.html
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches

Thanks.
- Chris


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to