On Sep 30, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > A pure netmask (without an associated address) is representable as > just a UINT8. Would it be terrible to write `protocolXYZ.netmask == > 24`?
Some are sent over the wire as a 32-bit mask, which could, conceivably, have holes in the middle. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
