2015-11-19 11:28 GMT+01:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <[email protected]>:
> It makes sense. I will create a bug and attach a capture to it. Then I > will reference the bug from the Gerrit issue. That is the process right? > yes exactly. > > Thanks, > Juanjo Martin > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Dario Lombardo < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I think that attaching some samples would help a lot. >> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I assumed that you were busy. Thanks for the answer. >>> >>> Is there anything I can help with? I may be able to spend some hours >>> this weekend. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Juanjo Martin >>> >>> On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Pascal Quantin < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Juan, >>>> >>>> 2015-11-18 17:36 GMT+01:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa <[email protected]> >>>> : >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> It has been almost two weeks and I am surprised I still didn't have a >>>>> review here. I am surprised because I always get reviews very early! (in >>>>> the first 24h, which is awesome). >>>>> >>>>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/11602/ >>>>> >>>>> I understand that everyone might be busy. I just want to make sure >>>>> this is not missed since it is (in my opinion) a very cool feature for >>>>> RTPS. >>>>> >>>>> Any volunteers? :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> As you saw we are quite busy, and polishing Wireshark 2.0 is taking a >>>> good part or our bandwidth :) >>>> One of the interest of Gerrit is to ensure that patch sets do not get >>>> lost ! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Pascal. >>>> >>> >>> >>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> >>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>> mailto:[email protected] >>> ?subject=unsubscribe >>> >> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> >> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:[email protected] >> ?subject=unsubscribe >> > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
