On Nov 30, 2015, at 6:40 AM, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should we move codecs functions to one of the existing libraries? Or add it > to its own? They already *are* in their own library, but it's a static library, not a dynamic library; perhaps we should just make libcodec a dynamic library, and export functions from it with WS_DLL_PUBLIC. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
