Do you know which would be the approach? I am willing to implement it. Any idea is very much appreciated!
Thanks, Juanjo On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Roland Knall <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > No, currently there is no direct way to do this. And any new way would > require a change to the dissectors handling the messages > > regards > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Let's say I have several submessages in a packet (RTPS). When I filter, >> one of them matches so the whole RTPS (UDP datagram) matches and thus, it >> is shown in the display. However, if the amount of submessages is large >> (200?), it is quite tedious to find the matching submessage. >> >> Is there any way in Wireshark (GUI or changing source code) to solve my >> issue? Highlighting the field that makes something match a filter or >> something like that. >> >> Thanks! >> Juanjo Martin >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> >> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:[email protected] >> ?subject=unsubscribe >> > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe > -- Juanjo Martin Applications Engineer Professional Services Group Office: +34 958 27 88 62 Mobile: +34 622 73 29 03 [email protected] www.rti.com
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
