How about grouping them as an 'Unknown Extension'?
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Mike Morrin<[email protected]> wrote: I have a dissector which does not yet dissect all of the possible information elements of a protocol. What should the dissector do when it recognises that an IE cannot be handled? - Ignoring the un-dissected octets leaves the user with a false sense of believing the dissection was complete - DISSECTOR_ASSERT is much too invasive. - Expert info, would seem to be the best option, but I recall that it was intended to be used for providing information about the captured packets, rather than about dissector deficiencies. What is the generally accepted solution? | This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com | ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
