I've been wondering that myself, and I'm leaning towards "yes it should" because there have been many cases where I couldn't use proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint where I wanted to because masks were involved. -----Original Message----- From: Anders Broman <[email protected]> To: wireshark-dev <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Jul 18, 2016 8:45 am Subject: [Wireshark-dev] proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint() returns unmasked value - should it?
Hi, proto_tree_add_item_ret_uint() returns the value corresponding to the length of the value fetched e.g uint8, uint16 etc but does not take the mask of the hf entry into consideration which lead to a bug in an proprietary dissector I have. Should it in fact return the value displayed in the corresponding hf variable e.g take the mask into consideration? Regards Anders ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
