On Aug 8, 2016, at 9:00 AM, João Valverde <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is there some reason not to treat "you can license this under the BSD >> license or under the GPL" as an acceptable license? > > Please review https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/16957/. That's still special-casing the dual-licensed files; any reason not to just treat it as an acceptable license by adding "BSD (3 clause) GPL (v2)" to WHITELISTED_LICENSES? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
