I used Qt 5.7 to build on Windows, 64-bit, yesterday and today. Should it
be avoided, in favor for Qt 5.6 ?

Gilbert

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 12 September 2016 at 20:22, Bill Meier <wme...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/12/2016 3:11 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
>>
>>> I'm finally getting around to building Wireshark (Windows 7 32 bit)
>>> again.
>>>
>>> What version of QT should be used ?
>>>
>>> WSDG sec 2.2.4  doesn't really say (although shows 5.5 in the example).
>>> WSDG sec 2.2.10 (which I just happened to see) says 5.6.1
>>> The Master buildbot seems to be using 5.3
>>>
>>> Also: wdsg sec 2.2.4 implies that the "OpenGL" version should be used.
>>> Is this correct ?
>>>
>>>
>> Update: I now see that master is actually using QT 5.6 so I'll use that
>> version. (I was wrongly looking at a Wireshark 2.2 builder).
>>
>> Still not sure about Open-GL vs not Open-GL ?
>>
>>
> As per the WSDG, Sect 2.2.10, 5.6.1 is recommended, although there is a -1
> build out now from Qt.
>
> I don't think you get the choice of non Open GL for 5.6 onwards.
>
> The docs could be cleaned up a bit here, they should list the recommended
> Qt versions for each release and all the examples should be consistent.
>
> Windows is actually a bit further forwards here in the Qt version used,
> because of no in-built distribution inertia.
>
> --
> Graham Bloice
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=
> unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to