Hi Gerald, I will be also impact mail-archive ? ( http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/info.html ) because i looking direclty on web interface (and not subscribe to the mailing...)
Cheers On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote: > Traditionally, Bugzilla hasn't had very strong antispam measures. This has > become a major issue for some public installations. For example, the > Eclipse project now requires explicit permission for new users to open bugs: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1306750 > > We've been getting spam on bugs.wireshark.org but fortunately for us the > volume is still low and it's easy enough to just set the "private" flag on > the offending bugs. However, we have a separate self-inflicted issue. We > log bug activity via the wireshark-bugs mailing list and those messages are > archived, which effectively means we provide cheap and easy spam hosting at > a popular web address. Cleaning up these messages is an inconvenient and > manual process. > > As a result I'm disabling the archive feature on the wireshark-bugs > mailing list this upcoming Saturday, December 31. The mailing list itself > will still be up and running and old archived messages will still be > available, but new messages will not be archived after that date. > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject= > unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
