Hi,

I would like to know where this is done:

 I analysed the code and found that for #1 is created "full"
conversation (full = SRC_IP:SRC_PORT <-> DST_IP:DST_PORT) with UDP as
protocol.

because that sounds questionable. 

Thank,
Jaap


> On 1 Jan 2017, at 21:21, Jirka Novak <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  my question is related to Bug 11446 and behaving I'm observing with
> attached sample.
>  The issue (demonstrated with my sample) is how RTP stream is decoded
> when RTP stream starts before SIP with SDP is captured (you start
> capture in mid of session).
>  My sample:
> #1 - RTP packed (172.16.176.24:5012->172.16.176.11:8204)
> #2-#4 - SIP with SDP
> #5 - RTP packet (172.16.176.24:5012->172.16.176.11:8204)
> 
>  Nowadays #1 and #5 is shown as UDP.
>  Expected behaving is that #1 can be shown as UDP, but #5 should be
> shown as RTP packet (or #1 and #5 can be shown as RTP packet).
> 
>  I analysed the code and found that for #1 is created "full"
> conversation (full = SRC_IP:SRC_PORT <-> DST_IP:DST_PORT) with UDP as
> protocol.
>  SIP/SDP analyse then tries to find conversation for proposed media,
> but only in half way (SRC_IP:SRC_PORT or DST_IP:DST_PORT). As
> consequence of it (my understanding), it do not find it and creates new
> "half" conversation with RTP protocol.
>  When #5 is decoded, the "full" conversation is found and it is decoded
> as UDP then.
>  Is there a way how to solve it?
> 
>  I know that there is option for conversation to set packet number from
> which is conversation valid. But it do not work in this case, because
> "full" conversation does exists.
> 
>                                               Sincerely yours,
> 
>                                                       Jirka Novak
> <x4.pcapng.gz>___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to