On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > > On 6 Feb 2017, at 00:08, Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:42:32PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote: > >> On 05-02-17 21:28, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl > >>> <mailto:jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Does anyone else get ridiculous wide (as in over 2000 px wide) > preference dialog > >>> on GTK development build? > >>> It seems that the new 'title only' preferences, of RDP, DAP, SAP, > etc, are long > >>> lines, which are wrapped in the Qt interface, but not in the GTK > interface. > >>> > >>> Hi Jaap, > >>> > >>> May be because user use now Qt ? ;-) > >>> > >>> > >> > >> And now seriously? > > > > I can reproduce this problem (with 2.0.5 and master > > (v2.3.0rc0-2268-g9ffff86e8d) with GTK+ 3.77.2, the dialog is very wide. > > I guess it has something to do with the children not being constrained > > while the parent tries to adjust to the largest width. > > > > Maybe setting the maximum width hint for the label would help? (No idea > > how, would have to read the fine manual for that.) > > > > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for having a look. Indeed we’ll need to tweak the preference label > widget to word wrap, as does the Qt version. Let’s see what we can find. > > Thanks, > Jaap > > PS: I’ve seen no bug reports on this. If this indeed is a problem existing > from 2.0 on, does this show that the legacy interface sees little use? > Good question.. I don't known if gerald have some stats from (auto)update tools ? May be also the issue coming from a change on GTK ? > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject= > unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
