On Feb 11, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Bálint Réczey <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for going without a new layer of indirections. > Making libgcrypt mandatory is easy and every level of indirection make > understanding the code harder which is a source of bugs. +1 Enough places in Wireshark use it, and there will probably be, over time, 1) more encryption in protocols and 2) more calls for Wireshark to do decryption whenever possible, so I consider it worthy of deeming an essential support library for packet analysis. If you want a small tool to run on devices, put a *capture* tool there and do the *analysis* on something big enough to do the job. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
