On Feb 13, 2017, at 4:53 PM, Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> wrote: > To me it looks like HAVE_LIBPCAP would be a candidate to solve somehow, as it > is > regularly involved when compiles break without this define. Would it maybe > make sense > so include a dummy version inside Wireshark that basically does (mostly) > nothing?
To what extent is it important that it be possible to build a version of Wireshark without packet capture capabilities? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
