On Feb 23, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Peter Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Validation of the protocol fields (like checksums) can be done without > external input and would be nice. On violation, these could add "expert > info" to the tree. > > But for Authorization digests in SIP, this would require external input > (credentials), possibly through a preference (filename or UAT). I think > it is better as separate script (since the input format can be different > depending on the user), but wouldn't object if a patch is proposed.
802.11 and SSL decryption also require external input, so it's not as if we don't do anything requiring external input. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
