Le 28 févr. 2017 01:55, "Joerg Mayer" <[email protected]> a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12:00PM +0100, Pascal Quantin wrote: > Nothing has changed since that time (except the fact that the link is > http://www.3gpp.org/specifications/60-confidentiality-algorithms). > As you said this was raised in the past so far not integrated to avoid > being potentially sued (like for AMR codecs, SNOW3G and ZUC ciphers,...). > None of us has paid a lawyer to verify whether we could safely add it or > not. What has changed is, that there seems to be a useable (from a copyright point of view) source code implementation available where it wasn't before. I still think that a pure source implementation is unproblematic. But out of curiosity: Is there a link to the patent, so we may have a look? A simple search on Google gives several links. Feel free to check whether you think they are applicable or not. Regards, Pascal. Thanks Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
