On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:31 PM, Michael Mann (Code Review) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael Mann has submitted this change and it was merged. > > Change subject: Add support for BASE_VALS_NO_UNKNOWN > ...................................................................... > > > Add support for BASE_VALS_NO_UNKNOWN > > BASE_VALS_NO_UNKNOWN is a special value_string value for only a single > (maybe 2) numerical value(s). If a field has the numerical value > that doesn't match anything in the value_string, just the number > is supplied for the field (no "Unknown") > > Dissectors that had this use case have been converted in the patch. The use case for this appears to be for fields that normally have a numerical value, and where particular numerical values have no special significance, but where certain numerical values have a special meaning - for example, a field that's normally a timeout in milliseconds, but where a value of 0 means "time out immediately" and a value of 0xFFFFFFFF means "never time out". Would a more descriptive name for it be something such as BASE_SPECIAL_VALS? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
