2017-04-16 16:11 GMT+02:00 Pascal Quantin <[email protected]>:

> Hi Graham,
>
>
> Le 16 avr. 2017 15:35, "Graham Bloice" <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
> Has there been any progress on building and testing libxml2 using OpenSUSE?
>
>
> No as I was waiting for a confirmation that we would follow this path and
> decide to add the dependency on the library.
>

I updated https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/20912


Pascal.


>
> On 5 April 2017 at 17:52, Graham Bloice <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5 April 2017 at 14:48, Pascal Quantin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ahmad and Graham,
>>>
>>> 2017-04-05 15:38 GMT+02:00 Graham Bloice <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5 April 2017 at 14:11, Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was advised on Gerrit to post this issue here as to garner wider
>>>>> input.
>>>>>
>>>>> This concerns proposed Change-Id I13c0a2f408fb5c21bad7ab3d7971e
>>>>> 0fa8ed7d783 [1] intending to add libxml2 as optional dependency to
>>>>> Wireshark.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am currently preparing to submit upstream, changes I did to the EPL
>>>>> v2 dissector (packet-epl.c).
>>>>>
>>>>> A significant change is the ability to optionally read in
>>>>> user-supplied XML device descriptions and to extract
>>>>> type/description/mapping information for aiding the dissection. See this
>>>>> previous submission of mine to the mailing list:
>>>>> https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201701/msg00154.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Seeing as there also has been interest for libxml2 support in
>>>>> dissectors in the past:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201005/msg00108.html
>>>>>
>>>>> https://ask.wireshark.org/questions/36063/using-libxml2-in-m
>>>>> y-own-dissector
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think, it would be a good idea to have this as optional dependency
>>>>> as Glib's GMarkup may be inadequate or inconvenient for parsing actual 
>>>>> XML.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to your feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Ahmad Fatoum
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/20912/
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the post,
>>>>
>>>> 1.  Where will the Windows binaries come from and are these supported
>>>> long term?  The  libXml2 downloads page indicates another site provides
>>>> Windows binaries [1].  The binaries at that site in the 64 bit directory
>>>> seem to be the most recent and are labelled as libXml2-2.9.3 [2].  The
>>>> current release of libXml2 is 2.9.4 which has a number of security fixes
>>>> among other bug fixes and enhancements [3] so it would appear that the
>>>> Windows binaries are not being maintained.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I suggest to use the binaries provided by openSUSE: they provide win32
>>> and win64 variants for libxml2 2.9.0 and we are already using their
>>> packages for several third party libraries. If it is really required to
>>> take the latest version, I can probbly give it a try (I already did this in
>>> the past to package a newer version than the one from openSUSE).
>>>
>>
>> That sounds good, I think for a new package we should use the latest
>> available to ensure we pick up all known security issues. LibXml2 2.9.4 was
>> released in May last year and 2.9.0 in Sep 2012.  I realise I'm attempting
>> to volunteer you for this task Pacal ;-)
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> 2.  According to the diagram at [1], libXml2 depends on iconv and
>>>> zlib.  We currently build our own zlib, will that be suitable for the
>>>> libXml2 dependency?  What will be the source of the iconv binary
>>>> (iconv-1.14 is available in the same download area as libXml2 [2])?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Same thing: we can use the ones provided by openSUSE (we already have
>>> those dependencies for other packages).
>>>
>>
>> iconv doesn't seem to be in the latest Wireshark builds (2.3.x). I think
>> iconv was required for GTK, regardless it seems that libXml2 requires it.
>> We will need to check that the OpenSUSE libXml2 is happy with our
>> built-from-source zlib.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3. The readme.txt in the download area ([2]) has some "interesting"
>>>> text:
>>>>
>>>> These are experimental 64bit binaries. For completeness, 32bit binaries
>>>> built using the same method are also included.
>>>>
>>>> The libraries in these packages are made using GCC (MinGW) toolchain. It is
>>>> presently not possible to use these libraries with any recent version of 
>>>> the
>>>> Microsoft Visual C compiler because of conflicting C-runtimes. To help you
>>>> resist the temptation, the import libraries (.LIB) are not provided at all.
>>>> If you need these libraries in an environment which mandates the use of the
>>>> Microsoft toolchain, you will have to build them from source yourself.
>>>>
>>>> and inspection of the download shows this is true, so it appears that
>>>> we'll need to rebuild to obtain the import .lib file.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As part of the process of integrating openSUSE libraries, we are
>>> generating the .lib file and adding it in the package we upload on our
>>> server, so it should be OK.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 4. Microsoft have a Visual Studio porting effort underway called vcpkg
>>>> [4], that does include libXml2, but unfortunately is only for VS2015 or
>>>> later.  If we move to VS2015 for main releases (post 2.4 release) then this
>>>> may be a viable source for libXml2 and other packages we use.  It might be
>>>> possible to use this to build VS2013 libXml2.
>>>>
>>>> 5.  Are there any manufacturers or tools that produce XML device
>>>> description files for the EPL dissector such that choosing XML as the input
>>>> format is the most sensible choice, or would another format be just as
>>>> applicable?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I agree XML can be painful, so this is a good question ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://www.zlatkovic.com/libxml.en.html
>>>> [2]: ftp://ftp.zlatkovic.com/libxml/64bit/
>>>> [3]: http://xmlsoft.org/news.html
>>>> [4]: https://github.com/Microsoft/vcpkg
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Graham Bloice
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Graham Bloice
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Graham Bloice
> Software Developer
> Trihedral UK Limited
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscr
> ibe
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to