Hi all, I remember a similar discussion around the Contents-Length header some years ago. Can’t we make a similar solution here? Then everyone will be happy and we have a backwards compatible solution.
Thanks, Jaap > On 13 Jul 2017, at 22:41, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> As Eric explained, having the HTTP response code as a number simply gives you >> much more advantages (filtering, comparisons, inequalities...) than having >> it in >> text. So this is clearly not a bug as it was done on purpose. > > I agree it's not a bug. For the existing purpose of Wireshark it does the > job. It just makes some other use-cases a bit more difficult. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
