Hi,

Can I register two new PCAP-NG block codes?  I’d like:

•       0x54534442 – Text Source Descriptor Block (TSDB)
•       0x54524200 – Text Source Record Block (TRB)

What do I need to do to register these?

See below for the reason for request.

Thanks and regards…Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of 
Guy Harris
Sent: 19 June 2017 22:54
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding support to Wireshark for CSV, TSV and SSV 
data types

On Jun 19, 2017, at 3:06 AM, Paul Offord <paul.off...@advance7.com> wrote:

>> Do you mean "deal with arbitrary CSV and TSV files" or "deal with IIS Web 
>> logs that are in CSV and TSV format"?
> 
> Yes - I mean arbitrary comma, tab and space separated.

I think Microsoft have an Excellent program that reads CSV files - and possibly 
TSV and SSV as well - and lets you do various forms of processing on them; it's 
available for Windows and macOS.  I think there's another program called 
LibreOffice Calc that's available for those platforms and for Linux, *BSD, and 
other OSes as well.

I.e., what does *Wireshark* provide here, for the *general* case of CSV/TSV/SSV 
files, that a spreadsheet program doesn't?

> Going back to the main objective, what I'm proposing is that we enable a 
> PCAP-NG file to contain any text-based data together with a schema - JSON or 
> XML or PCAP-NG proprietary.  There would be one WTAP_ENCAP_xxx type for any 
> text-based data type. Decoding would be based on the schema data.

pcapng, unlike pcap, can have blocks in it that *don't* correspond to packets.  
What's needed here are new pcapng block types:

        a "text source description block" (TSDB), which contains a schema and 
options (such as comments);

        a "text record block" (TRB), which contains:

                a "text source ID", which indicates which TSDB corresponds to 
the source of the record (the first TSDB has an ID of 0, the next one an ID of 
1, etc., along the lines of Interface Description Blocks);

                the text;

                options (such as comments).

This would *not* require a DLT_/LINKTYPE_ or a WTAP_ENCAP_ value.  It would 
also allow packets and text records to be combined into one file.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

______________________________________________________________________

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system.

Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of Advance Seven Ltd. E-mail transmission cannot be 
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The 
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

Advance Seven Ltd. Registered in England & Wales numbered 2373877 at Endeavour 
House, Coopers End Lane, Stansted, Essex CM24 1SJ

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to