Thanks for the link Pascal, I wasn't aware of it. I'll look up how tshark does and try to replicate that.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Pascal Quantin [mailto:pascal.quan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 1:05 PM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Cc: Sultan, Hassan <sul...@amazon.com> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info > > > > 2017-08-02 22:00 GMT+02:00 Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev <wireshark- > d...@wireshark.org <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >: > > > Here's my scenario : > > I am planning on using the Wireshark parsing engine in two ways : > 1) process massively large captures > 2) process live traffic, hopefully in the long term in a permanent > manner > once the memory growth of the engine can be controlled > > > > Did you have a look at https://blog.wireshark.org/2014/07/to-infinity-and- > beyond-capturing-forever-with-tshark/ ? > > > > In both cases, my automation does not care about any experts at all, it > only needs the field information (length/offset/name/hierarchy/encoding...) so > these experts are consuming memory for nothing in our case. > > As Wireshark evolves, new dissectors get added, which might add new > experts, and not having a global setting to turn them off would force us to > repeatedly search for new experts appearing, which is not a great experience. > > Now granted, I haven't done measurements on how much memory they > consume, the current experts might not represent much, but it's hard to judge > when experts can appear in any new dissector, one could appear tomorrow that > significantly alters that. > > > > Indeed they probably do not represent much compared to all the fields > registered by dissectors. Moreover you are the first one I remember asking for > such a feature. Like Jaap, I do not think this is a good move as of today. > > > > > Thanks, > > Hassan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org> ] On Behalf > > Of Jaap Keuter > > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:59 AM > > To: Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info > > > > Are we going to be picking off features one by one to get the memory > footprint > > down? Then I see a long list of preference settings growing from this. > Not > > something I look forward to. > > > > > > On 02-08-17 20:43, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Am I right in my understanding that there is no global way of > > > disabling insertion of expert information ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming I’m correct, would anyone object to me adding that > setting ? > > > That would be another way of lowering memory footprint. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thx, > > > > > > > > > > > > Hassan > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > __________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark- > dev <https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> > > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org> ?subject=unsubscribe > __________________________________________________________ > _________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark- > dev <https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > <mailto:wireshark- > dev-requ...@wireshark.org> ?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe