Hi Stig (and Sake),

2017-08-02 22:24 GMT+02:00 Stig Bjørlykke <s...@bjorlykke.org>:

> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev
> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
> > Regarding tcp.payload, I don't think tcp.payload in itself has any
> problems. I think the issue lies in tcp showing a length of 32 only, even
> though it has tcp.payload as its child.
>
> The tcp.payload field was recently added, have a look at
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/22374
>
> I do agree that this is displayed wrong and should be fixed.
> Increasing the length of the TCP header would be wrong because the
> payload is dissected by upper protocols and does belong with the TCP
> header.  Putting it at top level would also be wrong because it's not
> a protocol.
>

What about marking it as PROTO_ITEM_SET_GENERATED() as a first step? Tis
value is inferred from the tvb length and not a real field.

Regards,
Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to