If you want I can take a look.  I've added a few FT_ types in the past.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Sent: Sat, Aug 19, 2017 11:29 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Making oui_base_custom available more generally

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Michael Mann via 
Wireshark-dev<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:> I don't know exactly how far 
BASE_CUSTOM goes back, but it is for "custom"> display of a field.  But if 
there are enough fields with the same "custom"> formatting, it's probably time 
to make it a field type (or add BASE_ type)OK, it does go back that far.In 
looking at adding FT_OUI, some of it is obvious, but I am not surewhat this 
code is doing in proto_item_fill_label                case FT_ETHER:          
bytes = (guint8 *)fvalue_get(&fi->value);                        addr.type = 
AT_ETHER;                        addr.len  = 6;                        
addr.data = bytes;                        addr_str 
=(char*)address_with_resolution_to_str(NULL, &addr);                        
g_snprintf(label_str, ITEM_LABEL_LENGTH,                                   "%s: 
%s", hfinfo->name, addr_str);                        wmem_free(NULL, addr_str); 
                       break;and I suspect that the code I need to add is more 
like this:                case FT_OID:                        bytes = (guint8 
*)fvalue_get(&fi->value);                        name = 
oid_resolved_from_encoded(NULL, bytes,fvalue_length(&fi->value));              
tmp = oid_encoded2string(NULL, bytes,fvalue_length(&fi->value));               
if (name) {                                label_fill_descr(label_str, 0, 
hfinfo,tmp, name);                                wmem_free(NULL, name);      } 
else {                                label_fill(label_str, 0, hfinfo, tmp); }  
                      wmem_free(NULL, tmp);                        break;with 
oid_resolved_from_encoded etc replaced withget_manuf_name_if_known and a few 
other changes.Does that seem reasonable to you?There's a couple of other places 
in there where I am not sure what isgoing on, but I can stumble through ...-- 
Regards,Richard 
Sharpe(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)___________________________________________________________________________Sent
 via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>Archives:    
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: 
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev             
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to