+1 

But we might need a build step in the PD to enforce that fact. And have a 
closer eye on API changes to ensure no incompatibility may occur. 

Regards 
Roland 

> Am 09.09.2017 um 00:44 schrieb João Valverde 
> <joao.valve...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If I'm not mistaken we have a policy of binary compatibility between patch 
> releases (X.Y.Z)
> 
> Should we change the installation path for plugins from 
> $pkglibdir/plugins/X.Y.Z to $pkglibdir/plugins/X.Y to reflect that?
> 
> The logic being that out-of-tree plugins don't need and shouldn't have to be 
> reinstalled from X.Y.Z to X.Y.Z+1 (if that policy is followed correctly).
> 
> Thoughts?
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>            mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to