Hi, Maybe start off by checking other files, eg.the documentation files first. The dissectors are the easy targets.
Thanks,, Jaap > On 10 Nov 2017, at 10:44, Darien Spencer <cusn...@mail.com> wrote: > > Since this patch was merged, should we start replacing (manually or > automaticly) the license info in other files such as dissectors? > > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 at 6:09 PM > From: "Gerald Combs" <ger...@wireshark.org> > To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] SPDX-License-Identifier blurbs > Earlier today I gave a short talk about navigating Wireshark's source code. > One thing I mentioned is that we have quite a bit of boilerplate at the top > and bottom of most files, and in the past this has confused git when copying > and renaming files (for me, at least). > > I've uploaded a change at https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24302/ > <https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/24302/> which starts the process of > replacing the GPLv2-or-later blurb at the top of various files with > "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+". Is there any reason we shouldn't go > ahead with this?
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
