I'd just reopen the existing bug. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Wiens <[email protected]> To: wireshark-dev <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Jan 15, 2018 12:51 pm Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Subtree expand/collapse tracking
On 13.01.2018 08:31, Roland Knall wrote:> Could you create a bug entry for this, including an example trace,> with which we could demonstrate this behavior ?There is still an issue with this. Should I reopen the bug or create anew one?The subtree is now opened correctly, but only if you have selected atree element under the root tree.For the sample capture within tcp tree:select #1, expand tcp, expand tcp.flagsselect #2, tcp is expanded down to tcp.flags as expectedselect the ip root nodeselect #1, tcp is closed-- CheersThomas___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-devUnsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
