On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Simon Barber via Wireshark-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you post the code to gerrit (mark as WIP) so we can see exactly what
> you've done?

Well, it's already there ... have a bug fix though because I got a
capture with block acks (but not HE block acks ...)

It is, of course, mixed in with a lot of other changes:

https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/25685

> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Richard Sharpe
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> In handling 802.11ax Trigger requests I have refactored the handling
>> of block acks.
>>
>> In doing so I have eliminated the distinction between Block Ack
>> Requests and Block Acks in the search filters.
>>
>> They used to be things like 'wlan.bar.blah-blah' and 'wlan.ba.blah-blah'.
>>
>> They are all no just 'wlan.ba.blah-blah'.
>>
>> Does anyone have an opinion on whether or not that is unreasonable?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Richard Sharpe
>> (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>
>> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to