Fixed for me too :-)


On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Graham Bloice <graham.blo...@trihedral.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 15:32, Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've contacted the mantainer of the repo, and he confirmed some network
>> issue. They're working now.
>>
>>
> Yep, update now works for me as well.  No new version of clang though.
>
> graham@host:/mnt/c/Users/graham$ clang-6.0 --version
> clang version 6.0.0-svn321683-1~exp1 (trunk)
> Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
> InstalledDir: /usr/bin
>
>
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Dario Lombardo <
>> dario.lombardo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I guess it's an error their side
>>>
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/2018-February/062765.html
>>>
>>> That's pretty annoying, since it broke my automated docker builds :(.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Graham Bloice <
>>> graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22 February 2018 at 08:34, Dario Lombardo <
>>>> dario.lombardo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> I'm using clang from apt on ubuntu 16.04. According to this page
>>>>> https://apt.llvm.org/ I've added this
>>>>>
>>>>> deb http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/ llvm-toolchain-xenial main
>>>>> deb-src http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/ llvm-toolchain-xenial main
>>>>> # 5.0
>>>>> deb http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/ llvm-toolchain-xenial-5.0 main
>>>>> deb-src http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/ llvm-toolchain-xenial-5.0 main
>>>>> # 6.0
>>>>> deb http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/ llvm-toolchain-xenial-6.0 main
>>>>> deb-src http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/ llvm-toolchain-xenial-6.0 main
>>>>>
>>>>> to my lists, and then I've run apt update. Now I get this error:
>>>>>
>>>>> E: Failed to fetch http://apt.llvm.org/xenial/dis
>>>>> ts/llvm-toolchain-xenial/main/source/Sources.gz  Hash Sum mismatch
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone experiencing the same error?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, in WSL on my Win 10 desktop (Ubuntu 16.04.3).  I don't know how to
>>>> fix it either.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Graham Bloice
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> _______________
>>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> _______________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscr
>> ibe
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Graham Bloice
> Software Developer
> Trihedral UK Limited
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=
> unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to