On Mar 10, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Dario Lombardo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm working to reduce the number of warnings coming from clang code analyzer. > The tool lemon (from project sqlite, if I'm not mistaken) is full of > warnings, and (if I recall correctly) we had some issues pushing patches > upstream. I can see two roads we can take to reduce this high amount of > warnings: > > 1) patch our copy of lemon, without pushing upstream > 2) suppress clang's analysis for this file. > > Which one is more desirable? We're already not identical to upstream, as far as I know, with our own changes; I'd vote for 1). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
