On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Anders Broman <a.broma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Den tis 10 apr. 2018 21:15Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo...@gmail.com> > skrev: > >> Update on building the RPM on centos: >> >> - asciidoctor pkg is called rubygem-asciidoctor.noarch >> > > I think we should add this name in Findasciidoctor.cmake > > Ok. > - ninja is called ninja-build both in pkg name (as in debian/ubuntu) and >> in executable (differs from debian/ubuntu) >> - the build script calls directly ninja, then the build fails. I've fixed >> this by adding a symlink from ninja-build to ninja >> > > Did you build with ninja rather than with "Unix makefiles"? > Yes. I don't think it's a big deal, but I use ninja for my regular build, so I took this way. > >> Except from the manual actions above, the rpm build succeeded. I can try >> to fix some of them, but there are some issues still pending I can't figure >> out myself: >> >> Is the rpm build platform expected to be one? If yes, which one? If no, >> do we want to support all the flavors? It seems that different flavors >> require different package names (link in asciidoctor). I can be hard to be >> portable in this way. >> > I did not find an rpm with asciidoctor for suse12.2 so I downloaded the > gem files as descriptions from the asciidoctor site. I have not figured out > how to make cmake find it. Not sure if it's related to rpm- package failing. > I can give it a run on openSUSE.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
